Social Justice in Indonesian Judges Decision-Making

Abstract

A syllogism is a process of court decisions between the provisions of law in fact or value life in the community. It is influenced by the presiding judge’s educational background. In legal education, there are several legal thoughts that are not only different, but also contradict each other. Contest and segregation between legal thought have an impact on the decision-making process of judges in cases. Indonesian Judges in drawing up legal considerations are required to adhere to the doctrine of complementary paradigm of legal thoughts, how its application in the field, this study outlines based on a study that has been done by doing the in-depth interviews some Judges and an analysis of the decisions that have been made.