The Effectiveness Of The United Nation's Role In Responding To Wars Of Aggression And Self-Defense

Abstract

Transnational or cross-country relations result in the emergence of legal problems from one country to another that requires handling through good relations based on the law in each country. This is the reason for the formation of the International Criminal Court (ICC) which is the embodiment of the international criminal policy, a rational effort of the countries in the world to jointly tackle the four core crimes which are violations of delicto jus gentium. This policy is necessary because serious violations have real elements of a direct threat to peace and security in the world. The crime of aggression as international crimes stricto sensu indicates and fulfills the requirements that the crime is included in a serious human rights crime that is contrary to the highest legal norms in international law. The research uses a normative method with a statute approach and a historical approach. The results show that the ICC's jurisdiction over war crimes is already in the Rome Statute, however, the enforcement of the ICC's jurisdiction over crimes of aggression has not implemented concretely.